Review methodology
What we score
-
Fees & real cost
Maker/taker fees, withdrawal costs and how card vs. bank-rail payment methods change the real price — not just the headline rate.
-
Security & regulatory standing
Licensing, registered regulators, and the platform's actual incident history — including past breaches, drawn from public reporting, not the vendor's own framing of them.
-
KYC & country availability
Whether KYC is required, and which countries (including India) can actually sign up and use the platform.
-
Custody & withdrawal
Whether the platform is custodial or non-custodial, and any documented restrictions on withdrawals.
-
Fit
Who the platform is genuinely best for — and who should avoid it — rather than a one-size-fits-all score.
-
Maturity & track record
How established the platform is — real trading volume, a track record beyond a single recent launch. A brand-new or unproven platform is scored accordingly, not given the benefit of the doubt.
How the rating scale works
- 5.0 — Exceptional; a category leader with few real drawbacks.
- 4.0–4.9 — Strong; recommended for its intended use case.
- 3.0–3.9 — Capable, with caveats worth knowing.
- 2.0–2.9 — Limited; only for narrow needs.
- 1.0–1.9 — Not recommended for most users — typically a documented security incident, no regulatory standing, or severe country/withdrawal restrictions.
Independence & disclosure
FlixoCrypt is published by Binary Tech Stay Solutions and is editorially independent. Some outbound links are affiliate links, disclosed on every page; they never affect ratings or rankings. Read more on our about page.
Methodology FAQ
How does FlixoCrypt rate exchanges and wallets? +
Each platform gets a 1–5 rating that weighs fees, security and regulatory standing, KYC/country availability, custody model, fit and maturity, researched from the platform's own site, regulator filings, and independent reporting.
What does the rating number mean? +
5 is exceptional, 4 strong, 3 capable with caveats, 2 limited, 1 not recommended. A platform with a documented security incident or no regulatory standing is scored accordingly — the scale genuinely goes low when the evidence supports it, not just high.
Do exchanges or wallets influence the score? +
No. Platforms cannot pay for a rating, ranking or placement. Affiliate commissions never affect scores.
Do you personally test every platform hands-on? +
Not every one of them, end to end. Most reviews are researched and verified from the platform's official site, regulator registries, security-incident reporting and real user discussion, rather than a live account opened on every platform. Where a review draws on hands-on use, that is noted. We'd rather tell you exactly what a review is based on than overstate it.
How are security incidents tracked? +
Documented breaches, hacks or custody failures are recorded against a platform with what's publicly known — amount, date, cause where reported. "No major custody breach on record" means none was found in public reporting as of the last-verified date, not a guarantee none occurred.
How is regulatory status verified? +
A platform is only marked "regulated" against a named regulator or licence we can point to. Regulatory status varies by country — a platform regulated in one jurisdiction may operate unregulated in another.
How often are ratings updated? +
Reviews are re-verified as platforms change. Each page shows a last-verified date so you know how current it is.
What if a platform has a security incident after review? +
A material incident triggers a re-check and a new last-verified date, with the incident added to the record — reviews are not left describing a platform as if the incident never happened.
Reviewed by Arjun Mehta
Editorial lead overseeing FlixoCrypt's research, sourcing and verification process
Last verified: